In brief
Strengths are individual. People on the autism spectrum are very different from one another, and statements such as "everyone has special talents" or "nobody can …" cannot be backed by the sources we have read. What is established: the S3 guideline on diagnosis called for a profile of strengths and weaknesses at the end of the assessment. [2, Rec. 27] The therapy guideline stated that choice of occupation and educational route should be guided by individual strengths. [3, Rec. 110] A survey found that special interests can be a resource for many but can also trigger stigma. [1] Both guidelines have expired. [4]
This English translation was produced with AI assistance and has not yet been independently reviewed.
Strengths in assessment
The 2016 diagnosis guideline recommended on a consensus basis (strong consensus) that, at the end of the assessment, a profile of strengths and weaknesses be formulated at least qualitatively, based on the autism-specific assessment, the clarification of co-occurring conditions and the results of developmental and intelligence tests. [2, Rec. 27] It also stated that this had not been usual in Germany until then. [2, Ch. B.4.9.2] So in an assessment you can ask whether the report also describes strengths. According to an expert overview from 2024, the case history also included “strengths and resources” as well as the person’s expectations. [5]
Strengths and interests
A Berlin survey (2026) of 182 adults, 60 of them people on the autism spectrum, found: people on the spectrum used interests more strongly than the comparison group to cope with negative feelings and to learn, devoted about twice as much time to them on average (28.6 compared with 14.2 hours per week) and reported clearly more stigma and negative consequences. There were no significant differences in self-esteem, positive feelings and social identity. [1] It is a single, small, mostly highly educated sample. More: Special interests: Berlin study sees benefits for emotion regulation and learning, but also stigma and Repetitive behaviour and special interests.
On particular interests, the 2021 therapy guideline stated that whether they are disruptive must be judged from the perspective of the person and their surroundings; their meaning and benefit “cannot be reliably judged from outside”. [3, Ch. C.4.1]
Strengths in education and work
The 2021 guideline recommended basing the choice of occupation and training route on individual strengths and aiming for a freely chosen job in the open labour market. [3, Rec. 110] In application training, the fit between talent and the desired occupation should be considered. [3, Rec. 113] The guideline also pointed out that in autism there can be a large discrepancy between social and daily-living, motor and cognitive abilities, so that vocational suitability is partly underestimated and partly overestimated. [3, Rec. 115] More: Work and career and Transition from school to work.
Clichés and their limits
- “Everyone has savant talent.” We have read no robust source on this; we do not present it as a rule. Strengths can lie in many areas and are not the same for everyone.
- “Strengths mean: needs no support.” That is not true: strengths and support needs exist side by side. The guidelines describe both in one profile. [2, Rec. 27]
- “Strengths are only useful if they can be used economically.” Whether something is a resource also depends on what matters to the person themselves. [3, Ch. C.4.1]
What do we know – what is still open?
Finding (according to the sources read): Guidelines recommended a profile of strengths and weaknesses and strengths-oriented choice of occupation (expert consensus). [2, Rec. 27; 3, Rec. 110]
Single study: Special interests as a resource for emotion regulation and learning (small sample, cross-section, no statement about causes). [1]
Open:
- How common particular strengths are and what they depend on, we have not investigated.
- Whether orientation towards strengths in school and work leads to better outcomes is not shown in the sources read.
What else you should know
- Self-assessment counts. Ask the person what they are good at and enjoy. The guideline provided for regularly asking about the person’s wishes. [3, Rec. 4]
- Not covered: specific talents or fields of work.
Note: This article offers general information. It does not replace personal advice.
Sources and literature
- Bayer M, Dziobek I. Special Interests in Autism: Functions, Benefits, and Challenges. Autism 2026 (online 06.08.2026). https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261471572 – Survey
- DGKJP, DGPPN et al. Autismus-Spektrum-Störungen im Kindes-, Jugend- und Erwachsenenalter. Teil 1: Diagnostik. S3-Leitlinie, AWMF-Reg.-Nr. 028-018, Textstand 23.02.2016 (Empf. 27; Kap. B.4.9). – Guideline (in German) (expired; according to the document note under revision)
- DGKJP, DGPPN et al. Autismus-Spektrum-Störungen im Kindes-, Jugend- und Erwachsenenalter. Teil 2: Therapie. S3-Leitlinie, AWMF-Reg.-Nr. 028-047, Stand Text 02.05.2021 (Kap. C.4.1; Empf. 4, 110, 113, 115). – Guideline (in German); expired on 23 March 2026 (see no. 4)
- DGKJP. Aktuelle Leitlinien (Einträge 028-018 „Gültig bis 04.04.2021“ und 028-047 „Gültig bis 23.03.2026“). https://www.dgkjp.de/wissen/aktuelle-leitlinien/ – Professional society (website in German)
- Höhne E, Kamp-Becker I. Diagnostik der Autismus-Spektrum-Störung. Pädiatrie 2024;(4+5):27–32. – Expert overview (in German)
You might also be interested in
Knowledge articleUnderstanding autism
What is autism?
Knowledge articleUnderstanding autism
The autism spectrum: why autism looks so different
Knowledge articleUnderstanding autism
Social communication and interaction in autism
Knowledge articleUnderstanding autism
Repetitive behaviour and special interests
Found a mistake?
If something is factually wrong, out of date or unclear, let us know. You do not have to give any personal details.