Cross-sectional study
A study that examines a group at one point in time. It can show associations, but cannot prove what is cause and what is consequence.
- Also called
- cross-sectional survey, cross-sectional analysis
A cross-sectional study examines a group at one point in time (or in a short period) instead of following the same people over a long time. Examples from news items by Autismus Wissen: an online survey on special interests with 182 adults [1] and an analysis of insurance and death register data on life expectancy [2]. Both describe differences and associations; the authors point out that such cross-sectional data do not prove causes. [1; 2]
Editorial explanation (general, not from the sources): Because all data are collected at the same time, it is often impossible to say what came first; in addition, results depend on who takes part. Cross-sectional studies are therefore good for first indications and descriptions, but weaker than studies that compare groups over time or assign them at random. More: How good is a study? Evidence explained and Evidence.
Sources and literature
- Bayer M, Dziobek I: Special Interests in Autism: Functions, Benefits, and Challenges. Autism 2026 (online 06.08.2026). https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261471572 (Open Access, Europe PMC PMC13624314)
- Li G, DiGuiseppi CG, Blanchard A, Russell MT, Ing C: Autism Spectrum Disorder and Life Expectancy Among Medicaid Beneficiaries. JAMA Network Open 2026 (online 10.09.2026). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.33251
In detail: How good is a study? Evidence and recommendations explained
Articles on this term
Knowledge articleScience & research
How good is a study? Evidence and recommendations explained
Related terms
Found a mistake?
If something is factually wrong, out of date or unclear, let us know. You do not have to give any personal details.